On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 08:50:29AM -0400, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
In what ways were the answers different?
The peek() interface isn't really appliacable for netem since the
packet that it's requeueing wasn't dequeued in the first place.
In any case, what I'm trying to say is that netem should really
have its own queue (e.g., just fold tfifo in) to implement the
reordering and delays.
This does not prevent the user from creating children of netem
such as TBF to simulate a network environment where you have
loss/delay/jitter after traffic goes through a shaper.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html