On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:20:46 -0700
"Tim Anderson" <tanderson@mvista.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Artem,
> 
> I see your point. Ioctls are going away after all.

I don't know where that stupid story keeps coming from. Ioctl is alive
and well and there are more not less of them. There are lots of things
you *cannot* do with sysfs, including synchronization and handling
many kinds of changes to objects that can appear and disappear. Ditto
there are problems with getting a consistent snapshot via sysfs because
you can't atomically read multiple fields.

So please stop this 'ioctls are going away' stuff, its bunkum.

Alan
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/