Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) | KernelTrap

Re: Linux Security Module Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

view
thread

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Jan Engelhardt

Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 1:40 am

On Oct 30 2007 12:23, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
quoted text>
> Instead of pushing TOMOYO Linux, I started developing
> comparison chart of security-enhance Linux implementations.
> The current version can be found in
>
> http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/wiki-e/?WhatIs#comparison

Smack Security Model: autolabel, as far as I can tell.
Smack Policy Generation: user - hand - and an editor
Apparmor tutorial (beats any FAQ at first):
	ftp://ftp.belnet.be/pub/mirror/FOSDEM/FOSDEM2006-apparmor.avi
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Oct 17, 7:18 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Andreas Gruenbacher, (Fri Oct 19, 1:26 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Oct 19, 1:40 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, James Morris, (Fri Oct 19, 2:07 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Oct 20, 4:05 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, James Morris, (Sat Oct 20, 3:57 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 21, 3:59 pm)

Re: Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Sun Oct 21, 6:12 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 22, 9:09 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], James Morris, (Mon Oct 22, 9:56 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 22, 9:57 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Chris Wright, (Mon Oct 22, 10:16 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Giacomo Catenazzi, (Mon Oct 22, 10:44 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 1:55 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:10 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Chris Wright, (Tue Oct 23, 2:13 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:13 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:14 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, (Tue Oct 23, 2:14 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:18 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Serge E. Hallyn, (Tue Oct 23, 8:20 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 8:28 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Serge E. Hallyn, (Tue Oct 23, 8:34 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 23, 5:31 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Chris Wright, (Tue Oct 23, 5:32 pm)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Oct 23, 10:06 pm)

Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to ..., Simon Arlott, (Wed Oct 24, 4:50 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 5:55 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Wed Oct 24, 11:11 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 11:51 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Wed Oct 24, 11:59 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 12:04 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Wed Oct 24, 1:18 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 1:46 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., David P. Quigley, (Wed Oct 24, 2:02 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 2:29 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Serge E. Hallyn, (Wed Oct 24, 2:37 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 2:42 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 2:51 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 2:58 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., David P. Quigley, (Wed Oct 24, 3:02 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., David P. Quigley, (Wed Oct 24, 3:04 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 3:31 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 3:58 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 4:13 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 4:32 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Oct 24, 4:42 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Chris Wright, (Wed Oct 24, 5:23 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Ray Lee, (Wed Oct 24, 5:35 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Chris Wright, (Wed Oct 24, 5:41 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 6:03 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Peter Dolding, (Wed Oct 24, 6:26 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Alan Cox, (Wed Oct 24, 6:41 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 6:42 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., david, (Wed Oct 24, 6:50 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., david, (Wed Oct 24, 7:11 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Oct 24, 7:19 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Kyle Moffett, (Wed Oct 24, 8:50 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Bernd Petrovitsch, (Thu Oct 25, 2:19 am)

Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Oct 25, 3:23 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Thu Oct 25, 4:38 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Thu Oct 25, 4:44 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Ray Lee, (Thu Oct 25, 9:04 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 25, 10:10 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Ray Lee, (Thu Oct 25, 11:17 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Alan Cox, (Thu Oct 25, 3:21 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Thu Oct 25, 4:09 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Greg KH, (Thu Oct 25, 7:56 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., david, (Thu Oct 25, 8:45 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Peter Dolding, (Thu Oct 25, 10:44 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Oct 26, 12:09 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Fri Oct 26, 2:46 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Greg KH, (Fri Oct 26, 8:54 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Greg KH, (Fri Oct 26, 8:58 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Fri Oct 26, 9:32 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Fri Oct 26, 4:26 pm)

eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security *Modu ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Sat Oct 27, 7:07 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Tetsuo Handa, (Sat Oct 27, 7:08 am)

eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Mo ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Sat Oct 27, 7:47 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Stefan Richter, (Sat Oct 27, 10:31 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Oct 27, 11:22 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Oct 27, 11:29 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security ..., Adrian Bunk, (Sat Oct 27, 5:55 pm)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security * ..., Adrian Bunk, (Sat Oct 27, 6:21 pm)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Stefan Richter, (Sun Oct 28, 2:25 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 5:01 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Stefan Richter, (Sun Oct 28, 7:37 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Simon Arlott, (Sun Oct 28, 7:59 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 9:55 am)

RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Hua Zhong, (Sun Oct 28, 11:48 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 11:51 am)

RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Hua Zhong, (Sun Oct 28, 12:05 pm)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 28, 12:25 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 12:42 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Oct 28, 1:46 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Sun Oct 28, 3:08 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Alan Cox, (Sun Oct 28, 3:50 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Peter Dolding, (Sun Oct 28, 4:55 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 28, 10:12 pm)

Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework], Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Oct 29, 4:51 pm)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Mon Oct 29, 5:29 pm)

Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Fram ..., Lee Revell, (Mon Oct 29, 5:46 pm)

Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Fram ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Oct 29, 6:19 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Toshiharu Harada, (Mon Oct 29, 8:23 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Toshiharu Harada, (Mon Oct 29, 8:37 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 30, 1:40 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Tue Oct 30, 1:50 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Toshiharu Harada, (Tue Oct 30, 2:21 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 30, 2:27 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Bernd Petrovitsch, (Tue Oct 30, 2:41 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Tue Oct 30, 6:11 am)

Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Xavier Bestel, (Tue Oct 30, 6:19 am)